Temptation bundling
Claim assessed: Allowing yourself a pleasure only while doing something you put off makes you do it more often.
Published · how we work
In short
Temptation bundling means tying a pleasure to a useful thing you keep putting off. For example, you only listen to your favourite novel at the gym. The idea and the name come from Katherine Milkman and her colleagues. Their first study, with 226 participants, found a large effect in the first week that faded after a few weeks. A study of almost 7,000 people, also by her team, found a smaller effect that lasted for months.
What it says
Two problems solved at once. Milkman, Minson and Volpp (2014) start from an observation: some activities are pleasant now but give nothing later (a TV series, an airport novel). Others are unpleasant now but useful later (exercise, a postponed task). If you tie them together, the pleasure pulls you towards the useful activity, and the time spent on the pleasure no longer feels wasted. The authors link this to the tendency to prefer immediate rewards over delayed ones.
The first study. The participants were 226 students and staff at a US university, in the autumn of 2011, randomly split into three groups:
- the first group got an iPod with four audio novels of their choice, but the iPod stayed in a locker at the gym and could only be listened to there;
- the second group got the same novels on their own iPod, with the advice to listen to them only at the gym;
- the control group got a $25 bookshop gift card.
The researchers counted gym entries from the access cards.
What came out. In the first week, the group with the novels kept at the gym went 51% more often than the control group: 0.48 extra visits against 0.94 a week, after the authors’ adjustments. The group that only got the advice went 29% more often, but the difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.09). The effect then shrank week by week. After the Thanksgiving break, when the gym was closed, it disappeared entirely. The authors noted that the people who gained most were those who enjoyed their first workout with a novel, and the busiest ones.
People want to be bound. At the end, participants were offered the chance to pay for another month with the iPod locked at the gym, even though they could otherwise take it home. 64% said they liked the idea, and 61% offered more than zero (almost $7 on average).
The large study. Kirgios et al. (2020) tested the version without the locker, in a four-week online programme run with the 24 Hour Fitness gym chain. Participants earned points for each visit, planned their workouts and got reminder messages. Some also got a code for a free audiobook, and some of those also got an explanation of the technique, with the advice to enjoy their favourite shows, audiobooks or podcasts only while exercising.
- Against those with no audiobook: with the audiobook and the explanation, people were 13.6% more likely to get to the gym in a given week during the programme. In the 10 weeks after the programme, they were 10.3% more likely. This comparison covered 6,792 people, but it is quasi-experimental (the groups were formed with different probabilities, and the authors corrected for this by weighting).
- Against those with the audiobook but no explanation: the explanation itself had a small effect. During the programme, the difference was marginal. In the 10 weeks after, those who had the explanation were 6.2% more likely to go to the gym in a given week, but did not make more visits in total. This comparison, of 2,334 people, was the preregistered one.
The authors think the explanation mattered little because the audiobook from the gym already “said” what it was for: in a separate survey, 80% of 75 people guessed that the audiobook was meant for the gym.
A related idea. Woolley and Fishbach (2016) found, across several studies, that people persist longer in a useful activity when they focus on its immediate enjoyment rather than its later benefit. For example, music in a high school classroom increased students’ persistence.
Example
You have a podcast you can’t wait to hear and a pile of dishes you keep putting off. You make a rule: you only listen to the new episode with your hands in the sink. The example is an illustration, not a study cited here.
How to apply it
The steps below are a practical way of applying it that we propose, based on the cited studies.
- Pick a pleasure that pulls you back. In the first study, the novels were chosen as hard to put down. Something that ends on a cliffhanger, such as a series or a novel in episodes, makes you want to come back.
- Tie it to an activity it fits with. An audiobook goes with running or housework, not with studying for an exam.
- Make your rule hard to break, if you can. In the first study, the effect was larger when the novels stayed at the gym than when participants only resolved to listen there.
- Expect the effect to drop after a break. After the holiday, the effect disappeared. The authors suggest renewing your appetite after breaks, for example by listening to a small part outside the gym, so that you want the rest again.
Limits and nuances
- Both main studies come from the same team. Katherine Milkman is a co-author of both, and we found no independent replications.
- The first study is small, and the effect faded. Over its whole duration, the effect of the locker group fell to 0.21 extra visits a week and is no longer statistically significant.
- The version you can do on your own has a smaller effect. In the first study, the advice without the locker had a marginal effect. In the large study, the explanation added little on top of the free audiobook. Moreover, only 13–14% of participants downloaded the audiobook, so we don’t know how many actually applied the technique.
- The studies measured gym visits, not effort. We don’t know how much people did at the gym. The authors of the large study note that a pleasure can also distract from effort.
- One of the original explanations no longer holds. Milkman et al. (2014) started, among other things, from the idea that willpower is used up like a resource and restored by pleasures. Large replications of this idea found an effect close to zero (details in the entry on ego depletion).
- What we read. Milkman, Minson and Volpp (2014), in the 2013 manuscript version from the University of Pennsylvania repository, and Kirgios et al. (2020) we read in full. For Woolley and Fishbach (2016) we read the abstract.
Sources
- Katherine L. Milkman, Julia A. Minson, Kevin G. M. Volpp (2014). Holding the Hunger Games hostage at the gym: An evaluation of temptation bundling
- Kaitlin Woolley, Ayelet Fishbach (2016). For the fun of it: Harnessing immediate rewards to increase persistence in long-term goals
- Erika L. Kirgios, Graelin H. Mandel, Yeji Park, Katherine L. Milkman, Dena M. Gromet, Joseph S. Kay, Angela L. Duckworth (2020). Teaching temptation bundling to boost exercise: A field experiment
See also: Delayed gratification, Ego depletion, Habit formation